Listings

Home
Sitemap
Temples
Gurudwaras
Jain Temple
Mosques
Churches
Restaurants
Bazaars
Jewellers
Beauty
Travel
Weddings
Theaters
Students
Education
Associations
Newspapers

Hot Spots

Finance
India Links
Immigration
Insurance
Call Home

Society

Adoption
Charities
Art & Culture
Talent
Movies
Book Shelf

Personal

Ask-A-Desi
Chat and Blog
Homepages
Insurance
Classifieds

About Us

Contact Us
Submit
Register
Search
About Us
Advertise

Frequently Asked Questions and Quries on US Immigration and Life

GaramChai.com >> Immigration >> Immigration FAQ

Tips and Useful information on US Immigration // April 2007 Immigration Update // H1-B Update // Temporary Employment Authorization // Petitions for R-1/I-360 Religious Worker Status // What if You Overstay Your Visa? // Drunk Driving Can Get You Deported

For other Immigration details and links, visit GaramChai.com's Immigration section


Temporary Employment Authorization Documents become more difficult to obtain

As of October 1, any individual in need of an Employment Authorization Document (EAD) -- interim or not – must send Form I-765 to the address indicated by the form’s instructions. Local processing will no longer take place, and the form requesting it has already been discontinued. Until October 1, offices that had been accepting applications locally may continue to do so, but will simply forward them to the appropriate service center rather than processing them. Applicants are best advised to send their forms directly to the indicated center for fastest service. After October 1, local offices will return any Form I-765 to the applicant, advising him or her to redirect the application.

As a result of this change, local USCIS offices will no longer produce interim Employment Authorization Cards. Those whose EAD applications have been pending 90 days may still use InfoPass to schedule appointments at local offices to obtain an interim EAD, but processing will no longer be local. Rather, the local office will call the service center to inquire about the case; however, it will not issue the EAD. (According to USCIS, their aim is to respond to any such phone call within 30 minutes.) It is therefore especially important for applicants to allow adequate lead time and respond promptly to USCIS requests for documentation. For example, failure to attend a biometrics appointment, or a delay submitting information requested by USCIS may
re-start the 90-day period.

Even in a straightforward case of EAD renewal, the centralization of I-765 processing and the possible shift to a more distant location means the turnaround time may well lengthen. USCIS recommends filing at least 100 days before the current EAD expires.
An internal USCIS memo, which it distributed to the immigration law community, indicates that the immigration service is very much aware of the recordkeeping burden the new, strict centralization has placed on the service centers. For example, the national centers have begun conducting daily records sweeps to identify all Form I-765s which have reached 60 days past receipt. This functions as a ten-day warning, since adjudication must occur by day 70 for USCIS to meet the 90-day deadline.

According to the USCIS memo, the change is a response to both technology and security issues. Equipment at local offices was older, and data reporting from local offices lacked consistency and timeliness.
For assistance with timely and accurate EAD filings, or to resolve problems related to an EAD filing, call Immigration Law Associates at (847) 763-8500.

Contributed by the staff of Immigration law Associates,P.C.
Disclaimer: The materials contained herein have been prepared by Immigration law Associates, P.C. for informational purposes only and are not to be considered legal advice. The materials on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, e-mail, articles or other communications related to this article should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The materials and /or transmission of the information are not intended to create and receipt does not constitute, an attorney client relationship.

Petition for R-1/I-360 Religious Worker Status Come Under Increased Scrutiny

(Contributed by the staff of Immigration law Associates, P.C)

Having found that immigration benefit fraud was pervasive in 2002, USCIS conducted a study on nonimmigrant (R-1) and immigrant (I-360) religious worker petitions in 2005 in order to assess their integrity. The study subjected a random sample of 220 religious worker petitions to more intense scrutiny than they normally receive. As a result, USCIS found approximately 33% of all petitions to be fraudulent. Some examples outlined by the study included “paper” churches, misrepresentations of qualifications and duties of the beneficiary, falsification of sponsor’s ability to pay, and a failure to report current deportation proceedings.

This result forebodes a heightened scrutiny for future religious worker petitions. Some immigration watchdogs argue for significantly curtailing the R-1 nonimmigrant religious worker visas, because of the possibility of bringing radical clerics related to terrorist groups, while religious leaders counter that they need the program because of the shortage of Americans who choose religious vocations. The Department of Homeland Security is currently working to resolve the issue by significantly increasing the number of officers engaged in fraud detection.

This is an important development, particularly with regard to the Korean community, given that South Korea ranks among the top three countries of origin for receiving religious worker status.

One can apply for R-1 or I-360 religious worker status upon a valid job offer from a sponsoring religious organization such as churches, synagogues and mosques. Qualifying religious occupations must be religious in nature, including not only clergymen such as ministers and imams, but also religious instructors, cantors, religious translators, or religious broadcasters. However, janitors, fund raisers, solicitors of donations are not qualified occupations. Any secular duties carried out by “a religious worker” must be incidental.

For both R-1 and I-360, an applicant must show that the occupation is religious in nature, full-time, and can be performed by a religious worker only. The applicant must also be qualified to fill the position, i.e., received a theological or religious training, and the sponsoring organization must demonstrate that it needs such a full-time position. Additionally, the applicant must attest that he or she has been a member of its denomination for at least two years, and the sponsor is a bona fide religious organization, qualified for a tax-exempt status, and has a financial capacity to pay for the applicant’s payroll. When filing for permanent residence, the I-360 immigrant religious worker applicant also has an additional requirement to demonstrate that he or she has at least two years of continuous experience in the relevant field immediately prior to the filing.

An R-1 applicant may apply for the visa at the US Embassy or Consulate which has jurisdiction over his or her place of permanent residence. However, if the applicant is already in the States in another non-immigrant status, it may be more advantageous to change status in the States. This is so, particularly since the USCIS fraud assessment.  Embassies and Consulates handle a high volume of fraudulent petitions, and thus, the standard of scrutiny is higher abroad than in the States.

Finally, it should be noted in applying for these religious worker status that Consular officers and USCIS examiners have considerable latitude in adjudicating the case. Therefore, any claims with respect to the applicant’s experience, training, membership or the position offered must be supported by documentary evidence, carefully prepared by a seasoned immigration attorney. Failure to provide sufficient evidence or any required information may subject the applicant to the risk of R-1 or I-360 status being denied.

In fiscal year 2006, India was amongst the top five countries of origin for religious worker visa recipients.

Disclaimer: The materials contained herein have been prepared by Immigration law Associates, P.C. for informational purposes only and are not to be considered legal advice. The materials on this or associated pages, documents, comments, answers, e-mail, articles or other communications related to this article should not be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. The materials and /or transmission of the information are not intended to create and receipt does not constitute, an attorney client relationship


Immigration Law Associate, P.C

Led by Elizabeth Walder, an attorney with over seventeen years experience in the field of immigration law, we are pleased to offer our services to the Indian community. Immigration Law Associates, P.C. is one of Chicago areas finest immigration law firms which represents individuals, corporations and other institutions from all around the world on all issues related to United States immigration and naturalization law. With five attorneys and six legal support professionals our firm includes Hindi, Urdu and Punjabi speaking staff.

Our Immigration services include: Employment based cases through PERM // H1B visas // L1 visas // Adjustment/Extension of status // Naturalization // Marriage based visas/ K1 // National interest waivers // J-1 waivers // Visas for medical personnel // Renewal of green card // Student visas. For more information please visit our website at www.immig-chicago.com. For advice tailored to your situation, please contact the Immigration Law Associates office at (847)763-8500 or by email at ewalder@immig-chicago.com. Our office is located at 8707 Skokie Blvd., Suite#302, Skokie, IL 60077

 

Search

Google

 

 

Advertisers

Buy Visitor's Travel Insurance

NRI Services

Ho Jayega

 

GaramChai © 1999-2007 || Terms of Use